Your progress:

Week 4 of 6

Agent Workflows and Handoffs

60-75 minutes
Design Your Agent Team
Colab notebook
Paper and pencil OK
Part 1

When one agent hits its ceiling

A single agent is powerful. But ask it to do something genuinely complex — research a topic, write a report, verify all the facts, format it, and deliver it — and you quickly hit limits. It loses track of earlier steps. Contradicts itself. Runs out of context window.

The most powerful AI systems in production are not single agents. They are teams of agents, each with a specific role, working together on a shared goal.

The team analogy

You would not ask one person to simultaneously be researcher, writer, editor, fact-checker, and publisher for a major report. You build a team. Multi-agent systems apply the same logic to AI.

Part 2

Orchestrators, workers, and handoffs

Orchestrator AgentWorker / Specialist Agent
Breaks the goal into subtasksExecutes one specific subtask
Assigns tasks to the right workersFocused on one skill or domain
Tracks progress, reassigns on failureReturns a result to the orchestrator
Makes the final output decisionDoes not need to know the big picture
Like a project managerLike a specialist consultant

A handoff is when one agent passes its output to another. The quality of handoffs determines the quality of the whole system. A bad handoff — wrong format, incomplete information, ambiguous instructions — causes errors that compound through every subsequent step.

🔍
Research Agent
Searches and extracts key facts. Passes structured findings to the writer.
Writer Agent
Takes research and produces a first draft. Passes to the fact-checker.
Fact-Check Agent
Verifies claims against sources. Returns corrections or approves for delivery.
Part 3

Error propagation and human checkpoints

The biggest risk in multi-agent systems is error propagation. If the research agent gets something wrong, the writer builds on that error, the fact-checker may miss it, and the user receives confidently wrong output. One bad step poisons everything downstream.

Rule of thumb

Put a human checkpoint before any irreversible action — sending an email, making a purchase, publishing content, executing code in production. Everything before that can be autonomous. Everything after needs a human approval step.

🛡 Responsible-AI Beat — Oversight by design

Good agent teams decide where a human approves before they’re built — not after something goes wrong. After you draw your pipeline below, mark a 🛑 everywhere a human must approve before the agent continues. The rule of thumb: a checkpoint is required before any action that is irreversible or affects someone else — sending an email, spending money, publishing, submitting a form, sharing personal data. Litmus test: “If the agent gets this step wrong, can you undo it?” If no, a human belongs in the loop there.

✏ Activity — Design Your Agent Team

Map a multi-agent pipeline from scratch

Choose a scenario and design the full pipeline. Be specific — name each agent, describe what it receives, what it produces, and where handoffs happen.

Go Deeper — Optional

Week 4 Python Notebook

Run in Google Colab — no setup, no install. Interactive Python exercises that reinforce every concept from this lesson.